Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Evaluation of injection methods for fast, high peak capacity separations with low thermal mass gas chromatography.

Evaluation of injection methods for fast, high peak capacity separations with low thermal mass gas chromatography.

Journal of chromatography. A (2015-03-31)
Brian D Fitz, Brandyn C Mannion, Khang To, Trinh Hoac, Robert E Synovec
ABSTRACT

Low thermal mass gas chromatography (LTM-GC) was evaluated for rapid, high peak capacity separations with three injection methods: liquid, headspace solid phase micro-extraction (HS-SPME), and direct vapor. An Agilent LTM equipped with a short microbore capillary column was operated at a column heating rate of 250 °C/min to produce a 60s separation. Two sets of experiments were conducted in parallel to characterize the instrumental platform. First, the three injection methods were performed in conjunction with in-house built high-speed cryo-focusing injection (HSCFI) to cryogenically trap and re-inject the analytes onto the LTM-GC column in a narrower band. Next, the three injection methods were performed natively with LTM-GC. Using HSCFI, the peak capacity of a separation of 50 nl of a 73 component liquid test mixture was 270, which was 23% higher than without HSCFI. Similar peak capacity gains were obtained when using the HSCFI with HS-SPME (25%), and even greater with vapor injection (56%). For the 100 μl vapor sample injected without HSCFI, the preconcentration factor, defined as the ratio of the maximum concentration of the detected analyte peak relative to the analyte concentration injected with the syringe, was determined to be 11 for the earliest eluting peak (most volatile analyte). In contrast, the preconcentration factor for the earliest eluting peak using HSCFI was 103. Therefore, LTM-GC is demonstrated to natively provide in situ analyte trapping, although not to as great an extent as with HSCFI. We also report the use of LTM-GC applied with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS) detection for rapid, high peak capacity separations from SPME sampled banana peel headspace.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Supelco
Chloroform, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Supelco
Naphthalene, analytical standard
Supelco
Methyl salicylate, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Methyl hexanoate, 99%
Supelco
Methyl hexanoate, analytical standard
Supelco
Methyl decanoate, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, ≥99%, PCR Reagent, contains amylenes as stabilizer
Supelco
Chloroform, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Butylcyclohexane, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Butylbenzene, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Bromobenzene, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Bicyclohexyl, 99%
Supelco
Decane, analytical standard
Supelco
Cyclohexane, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Propylbenzene, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Propylbenzene, ≥99.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Octane, electronic grade, ≥99.999% metals basis, ≥99% (CP)
Sigma-Aldrich
Nonyl alcohol, ≥98%, FCC
Sigma-Aldrich
Naphthalene, suitable for scintillation, ≥99%
Supelco
Nonane, analytical standard
Supelco
Undecane, analytical standard
Supelco
Tridecane, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Methyl decanoate, 99%
Supelco
Mesitylene, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Hexadecane, anhydrous, ≥99%
Supelco
Hexadecane, analytical standard
Supelco
Heptane, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
1-Hexadecanol, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
1-Octanol, ≥98%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
3-Octanone, ≥98%, FG