Skip to Content
Merck
CN

W293601

Propyl isobutyrate

≥97%, FG

Synonym(s):

n-Propyl-2-methylpropanoate

Sign In to View Organizational & Contract Pricing.

Select a Size

About This Item

Linear Formula:
(CH3)2CHCO2CH2CH2CH3
CAS Number:
644-49-5
Molecular Weight:
130.18
FEMA Number:
2936
Council of Europe no.:
289
UNSPSC Code:
12164502
PubChem Substance ID:
24901408
Flavis number:
9.414
EC Number:
211-417-4
NACRES:
NA.21
MDL number:
MFCD00053781
Organoleptic:
berry; melon; tropical; fruity; sweet
Grade:
FG, Kosher
Biological source:
synthetic
Food allergen:
no known allergens

Key Documents

View All Documentation
Technical Service
Need help? Our team of experienced scientists is here for you.
Let Us Assist
Technical Service
Need help? Our team of experienced scientists is here for you.
Let Us Assist

SMILES string

CCCOC(=O)C(C)C

InChI

1S/C7H14O2/c1-4-5-9-7(8)6(2)3/h6H,4-5H2,1-3H3

InChI key

AZFUASHXSOTBNU-UHFFFAOYSA-N

biological source

synthetic

grade

FG, Kosher

reg. compliance

EU Regulation 1334/2008 & 872/2012, FDA 21 CFR 172.515

assay

≥97%

refractive index

n20/D 1.395 (lit.)

bp

134 °C (lit.)

density

0.863 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.)

application(s)

flavors and fragrances

documentation

see Safety & Documentation for available documents

food allergen

no known allergens

organoleptic

berry; melon; tropical; fruity; sweet

Quality Level

400

pictograms

Flame
GHS02

signalword

Warning

hcodes

H226

Hazard Classifications

Flam. Liq. 3

Storage Class

3 - Flammable liquids

wgk

WGK 3

flash_point_f

80.6 °F - closed cup

flash_point_c

27 °C - closed cup

ppe

Eyeshields, Faceshields, Gloves, type ABEK (EN14387) respirator filter

Regulatory Information

新产品
This item has

Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number
SHBP5814
STBJ0700
MKBZ7732V
STBD8060V
STBC1128V

Don't see the Right Version?

If you require a particular version, you can look up a specific certificate by the Lot or Batch number.

Search for a COA

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

Saeedeh Noushini et al.
Scientific reports, 10(1), 19799-19799 (2020-11-15)
Diverse methods have been used to sample insect semiochemicals. Sampling methods can differ in efficiency and affinity and this can introduce significant biases when interpreting biological patterns. We compare common methods used to sample tephritid fruit fly rectal gland volatiles

Related Content

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service