Sign In to View Organizational & Contract Pricing.
Select a Size
Change View
About This Item
Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
C17H25NO3 · HCl
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
327.85
UNSPSC Code:
41116107
PubChem Substance ID:
EC Number:
227-521-8
MDL number:
grade
analytical standard
technique(s)
HPLC: suitable, gas chromatography (GC): suitable
application(s)
forensics and toxicology
veterinary
format
neat
storage temp.
−20°C
SMILES string
Cl.CN(C)CCOC(=O)C(c1ccccc1)C2(O)CCCC2
InChI
1S/C17H25NO3.ClH/c1-18(2)12-13-21-16(19)15(14-8-4-3-5-9-14)17(20)10-6-7-11-17;/h3-5,8-9,15,20H,6-7,10-13H2,1-2H3;1H
InChI key
RHKZVMUBMXGOLL-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Application
Refer to the product′s Certificate of Analysis for more information on a suitable instrument technique. Contact Technical Service for further support.
Still not finding the right product?
Explore all of our products under Cyclopentolate hydrochloride
Regulatory Information
新产品
This item has
Choose from one of the most recent versions:
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
Yosuke Ito et al.
The Journal of veterinary medical science, 77(2), 155-160 (2014-11-07)
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of sevoflurane concentration on canine visual evoked potentials with pattern stimulation (P-VEPs). Six clinically normal laboratory-beagle dogs were used. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane was detected from all
Zhen-Ying Cheng et al.
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 252(12), 1939-1946 (2014-08-15)
To investigate the effects of the relatively selective GABAAOr receptor antagonist (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl) methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA) on form-deprivation myopia (FDM) in guinea pigs. A diffuser was applied monocularly to 30 guinea pigs from day 10 to 21. The animals were randomized
Yakov Goldich et al.
American journal of ophthalmology, 159(1), 155-159 (2014-12-03)
To compare objective and subjective outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the fellow eye of the same patients. Single-center, retrospective case series. Seventeen patients with bilateral Fuchs endothelial dystrophy who underwent