Skip to Content
Merck
CN

W271810

Dimethyl anthranilate

greener alternative

natural, ≥98%, FG

Synonym(s):

Methyl N-methylanthranilate

Sign In to View Organizational & Contract Pricing.

Select a Size

About This Item

Linear Formula:
2-(CH3NH)C6H4CO2CH3
CAS Number:
85-91-6
Molecular Weight:
165.19
FEMA Number:
2718
Council of Europe no.:
756c
UNSPSC Code:
12164502
PubChem Substance ID:
24901283
Flavis number:
9.781
EC Number:
201-642-6
NACRES:
NA.21
MDL number:
MFCD00017183
Beilstein/REAXYS Number:
607217
Organoleptic:
grape skin; fruity; floral; sweet
Grade:
FG, Kosher, natural
Agency:
meets purity specifications of JECFA
Food allergen:
no known allergens

Key Documents

View All Documentation
Technical Service
Need help? Our team of experienced scientists is here for you.
Let Us Assist
Technical Service
Need help? Our team of experienced scientists is here for you.
Let Us Assist

Quality Level

300, 400

grade

FG, Kosher, natural

agency

meets purity specifications of JECFA

reg. compliance

EU Regulation 1334/2008 & 178/2002, FDA 21 CFR 172.515

assay

≥98%

greener alternative product characteristics

Less Hazardous Chemical Syntheses
Use of Renewable Feedstocks
Learn more about the Principles of Green Chemistry.

sustainability

Greener Alternative Product

refractive index

n20/D 1.579 (lit.)

bp

256 °C (lit.)

mp

17-19 °C (lit.)

density

1.126 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.)

application(s)

flavors and fragrances

documentation

see Safety & Documentation for available documents

food allergen

no known allergens

greener alternative category

Aligned

organoleptic

grape skin; fruity; floral; sweet

SMILES string

CNc1ccccc1C(=O)OC

InChI

1S/C9H11NO2/c1-10-8-6-4-3-5-7(8)9(11)12-2/h3-6,10H,1-2H3

InChI key

GVOWHGSUZUUUDR-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Looking for similar products? Visit Product Comparison Guide

Related Categories

General description

Dimethyl anthranilate is one of the main volatile constituents in citrus species such as mandarin, and calamondin.

Application


  • Effects of Dimethyl Anthranilate-Based Repellents on Behavior, Plumage Condition, Egg Quality, and Performance in Laying Hens.: Investigates the impact of Dimethyl Anthranilate-based repellents on laying hens, focusing on their behavior, plumage condition, egg quality, and overall performance (Terčič et al., 2020).

  • A simple method to discriminate Guangchenpi and Chenpi by high-performance thin-layer chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography based on analysis of dimethyl anthranilate.: Presents a chromatographic method to differentiate between Guangchenpi and Chenpi, emphasizing the role of Dimethyl Anthranilate in this differentiation process (Li et al., 2019).

pictograms

Exclamation mark
GHS07

signalword

Warning

hcodes

H319

Hazard Classifications

Eye Irrit. 2

Storage Class

10 - Combustible liquids

wgk

WGK 1

flash_point_f

216.7 °F - closed cup

flash_point_c

102.6 °C - closed cup

ppe

Eyeshields, Gloves, type ABEK (EN14387) respirator filter

Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number
SHBT6284
SHBT6288
SHBS9555
SHBR9962
SHBP4850

Don't see the Right Version?

If you require a particular version, you can look up a specific certificate by the Lot or Batch number.

Search for a COA

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

Field evaluation of dimethyl anthranilate as a bird repellent livestock feed additive.
Mason JR, et al.
The Journal of wildlife management, 636-642 (1985)
Volatile constituents of calamondin peel and juice (Citrus madurensis Lour.) cultivated in the Philippines.
Takeuchi H, et al.
J. Essent. Oil Res., 17(1), 23-26 (2005)
Analytical characterization of mandarin (Citrus deliciosa Ten.) essential oil.
Dugo P, et al.
Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 26(1), 34-46 (2011)
Dimethyl anthranilate as a bird repellent in livestock feed.
Glahn JF, et al.
Wildlife Society Bulletin, 17(3), 313-320 (1989)
Hayato Nishida et al.
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 72(3), 578-585 (2015-06-07)
Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight

Related Content

Global Trade Item Number

SKUGTIN
W271810-100G-K04061837877247
W271810-SAMPLE-K04061837877261
W271810-1KG-K04061834365686

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service