Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Short-term wear evaluation of thin acetabular liners on 36-mm femoral heads.

Short-term wear evaluation of thin acetabular liners on 36-mm femoral heads.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research (2013-07-19)
Aaron J Johnson, LaQuawn Loving, Lizeth Herrera, Ronald E Delanois, Aiguo Wang, Michael A Mont
ABSTRACT

Dislocation remains the leading cause of revision THA. One approach to decreasing prosthetic dislocation risk has been the use of larger femoral head component sizes. The upper limit of head size in metal-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty has historically been limited because of concerns about increased wear on thin polyethylene components. It is not known to what degree this concern should apply to more wear-resistant polyethylene components. We therefore determined (1) in vitro wear rates of polyethylene liners of varying thicknesses, (2) whether there were differences in the microscopic wear characteristics as a function of polyethylene thickness, and (3) whether thin polyethylene components resulted in early catastrophic failures. We used a hip wear simulator to compare the wear performance of 12 highly crosslinked polyethylene acetabular inserts. The internal diameter of all components was 36 mm, and there were three samples tested of each thickness (1.9, 3.9, 5.9, or 7.9 mm). Testing was conducted for 2.4 million cycles. Gravimetric mass loss was converted to volumetric loss, which was subsequently converted to theoretical linear penetration rates. Wear rates decreased with increasing polyethylene thickness. Mean ± SD wear rates for the 1.9-, 3.9-, 5.9-, and 7.9-mm groups were 5.0 ± 0.5, 3.2 ± 0.3, 2.5 ± 1.1, and 2.2 ± 1.3 mm(3)/million cycles, respectively (p < 0.016). Calculated penetration rates were 0.015, 0.012, 0.011, and 0.010 mm/million cycles, respectively (p < 0.016). There were no catastrophic failures in any group. Thinner polyethylene components demonstrated higher wear rates, although even the highest wear rate observed in the thinnest polyethylene specimen was lower than that commonly reported for noncrosslinked polyethylene components. While encouraging, these findings should be validated in vivo before clinical recommendations can be made.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Polyethylene, High density, melt index 2.2 g/10 min (190 °C/2.16kg)
Sigma-Aldrich
Polyethylene, low density, melt index 25 g/10 min (190°C/2.16kg)
Supelco
Polyethylene, analytical standard, suitable for gel permeation chromatography (GPC), 2,000
Sigma-Aldrich
Polyethylene, Medium density
Sigma-Aldrich
Polyethylene, Ultra-high molecular weight, average Mw 3,000,000-6,000,000
Sigma-Aldrich
Polyethylene, High density, melt index 12 g/10 min (190 °C/2.16kg)
Sigma-Aldrich
Polyethylene, Linear low density, melt index 1.0 g/10 min (190°C/2.16kg)
Sigma-Aldrich
Polyethylene, Ultra-high molecular weight, surface-modified, powder, 125 μm avg. part. size
Sigma-Aldrich
Polyethylene, average Mw ~4,000 by GPC, average Mn ~1,700 by GPC
Sigma-Aldrich
Polyethylene, Ultra-high molecular weight, surface-modified, powder, 34-50 μm particle size