Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic.

Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic.

Acta odontologica Scandinavica (2014-11-07)
Omer Kirmali, Alper Kapdan, Osman Tolga Harorli, Cagatay Barutcugil, Mehmet Mustafa Ozarslan
ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin in five different repair systems. Sixty specimens (7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) of zirconia ceramic were fabricated. All specimen surfaces were prepared with a 30 µm fine diamond rotary cutting instrument with water irrigation for 10 s and dried with oil-free air. Specimens were then randomly divided into six groups for the following different intra-oral repair systems (n = 10): Group 1, control group; Group 2, Cojet system (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany); Group 3, Cimara® System (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany); Group 4, Z-Prime Plus System (Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL); Group 5, Clearfil™ System (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); and Group 6, Z-Bond System (Danville, CA). After surface conditioning, a composite resin Grandio (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) was applied to the zirconia surface using a cylindrical mold (5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in length) and incrementally filled up, according to the manufacturer's instructions of each intra-oral system. Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc tests were used to analyze the bond strength values. There were significant differences between Groups 2-6 and Group 1. The highest bond strength values were obtained with Group 2 (17.26 ± 3.22) and Group 3 (17.31 ± 3.62), while the lowest values were observed with Group 1 (8.96 ± 1.62) and Group 6 (12.85 ± 3.95). All repair systems tested increased the bond strength values between zirconia and composite resin that used surface grinding with a diamond bur.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium(IV) oxide, 99.99% trace metals basis (purity excludes ~2% HfO2)
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium(IV) oxide, nanopowder, <100 nm particle size (TEM)
Sigma-Aldrich
Zirconium(IV) oxide, powder, 5 μm, 99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Isopropyl alcohol, ≥99.7%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, Laboratory Reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, anhydrous, 99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, suitable for HPLC, 99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, electronic grade, 99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Isopropyl alcohol, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, ≥99.8% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, BioReagent, ≥99.5%, Molecular Biology
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, USP, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, BioUltra, Molecular Biology, ≥99.5% (GC)
Supelco
2-Propanol, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, HPLC Plus, for HPLC, GC, and residue analysis, 99.9%
Supelco
2-Propanol, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, suitable for HPLC, 99.9%
USP
2-Propanol, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, reag. ISO, reag. Ph. Eur., ≥99.8% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%