Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Microtensile bond strength of dual-polymerizing cementing systems to dentin using different polymerizing modes.

Microtensile bond strength of dual-polymerizing cementing systems to dentin using different polymerizing modes.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (2007-03-08)
Cesar A G Arrais, Marcelo Giannini, Frederick A Rueggeberg, David H Pashley
ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of bond strength using dual-polymerizing cementing systems ([DCSs] defined as the combination of dual-polymerizing bonding agents and resin cements) used with indirect restorations has not been evaluated when used solely with the autopolymerizing mode. This study evaluated the in vitro microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of fourth- and fifth-generation DCSs with indirect composite restorations either light polymerized or autopolymerized. Occlusal dentin surfaces of 48 human third molars were exposed and flattened. Teeth were assigned to 8 groups (n=6) according to the DCS and polymerizing modes: All-Bond2/Duolink (AB2), Optibond/Nexus2 (OPT), Bond1/Lute-it (B1), and Optibond Solo Dual Cure/Nexus2 (SOLO). Bonding agents were applied to dentin surfaces and left in the unpolymerized state. Resin cements were applied to prepolymerized resin discs (2 mm thick/Z250), which were subsequently bonded to the dentin surfaces. The restored teeth were light polymerized according to manufacturers' instructions (PP/XL 3000) or allowed to autopolymerize (AP). Restored teeth were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and were both mesio-distally and bucco-lingually sectioned to obtain multiple bonded beams (1.2 mm2 of cross-sectional area). Each specimen was tested in tension at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/min until failure. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc test (alpha=.05). Failure patterns of tested specimens were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. The mean (SD) MTBS values (MPa) were: AB2/PP: 36.9 (6.5); AB2/AP: 32.7 (7.3); B1/PP: 38.2 (7.0); B1/AP: 13.0 (4.2); SOLO/PP: 33.2 (7.2); SOLO/AP: 23.4 (3.4); OPT/PP: 30.8 (7.5); OPT/AP: 13.1 (5.8). The AP groups showed significantly lower MTBS than the PP groups (P<.0001), except for AB2, which showed no difference between polymerization modes (P=.2608). The autopolymerizing mode of some dual-polymerizing cement systems may not be effective in promoting bond strength.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Probemaker MINUS
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ PLA® Probe Anti-Mouse PLUS
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Detection Reagents Brightfield
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ PLA® Probe Anti-Goat PLUS
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Detection Reagents FarRed
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Detection Reagents Green
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ PLA® Probe Anti-Rabbit MINUS
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Orange Starter Kit Mouse/Rabbit
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Detection Reagents Red
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ PLA® Probe Anti-Rabbit PLUS, Affinity purified Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Probemaker PLUS
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ PLA® Probe Anti-Mouse MINUS, Affinity purified Donkey anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ PLA® Probe Anti-Goat MINUS, Affinity purified Donkey anti-Goat IgG (H+L)
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Orange Starter Kit Goat/Rabbit
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Red Starter Kit Mouse/Goat
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Orange Starter Kit Mouse/Goat
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Red Starter Kit Goat/Rabbit
Sigma-Aldrich
Duolink® In Situ Red Starter Kit Mouse/Rabbit