Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • The effect of desensitizing dentifrices on dentin wear and tubule occlusion.

The effect of desensitizing dentifrices on dentin wear and tubule occlusion.

American journal of dentistry (2015-12-31)
Raquel Marianna Lopes, Miriam Lacalle Turbino, Denise Maria Zezell, Tais Scaramucci, Ana Cecilia Corrêa Aranha
ABSTRACT

To evaluate the effect of desensitizing dentifrices on dentin erosive wear, using a 5-day erosion-abrasion-remineralization cycling model. The effect of the dentifrices on dentin's tubule occlusion was also investigated. 30 samples of root dentin were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10): (1) Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint (control, 1,450 ppm F); (2) Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief (1,450 ppm F, Pro-Argin); and (3) Sensodyne Repair&Protect (1,450 ppm F, Novamin). Erosion was performed with a cola drink, for 5 minutes, 4x/day. Toothbrushing with the slurry dentifrices (1:2) was performed 2x/day, with electric toothbrushes, using standard pressure for 15 seconds. Surface loss (SL) was determined with optical profilometry at baseline and after the first, third and fifth days of cycling. Before treatment and in the end of the cycling, the amount of opened dentin tubules per area was evaluated in three randomly selected specimens from each group, by environmental scanning electron microscopy. The relative dentin abrasitivity (RDA) of the dentifrices was also measured. Data were statistically analyzed (α = 0.05). All the dentifrices showed a progressive increase in SL over time. However, no significant differences in SL among the dentifrices were observed at any time studied. Sensodyne Repair&Protect significantly reduced the number of opened dentin tubules when compared to the other groups. Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint showed the highest RDA, followed by Sensodyne Repair&Protect and then by Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief. The desensitizing dentifrices tested produced a similar rate of erosive dentin wear to the conventional dentifrice; however, only Sensodyne Repair&Protect was able to promote tubule occlusion.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, mesoporous, MSU-X (wormhole), average pore size 3.8 nm
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, nanoparticles, <50 nm particle size (DLS), 20 wt. % in isopropanol
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, nanowires, diam. × L 2-6 nm × 200-400 nm
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, nanopowder, 13 nm primary particle size (TEM), 99.8% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, Type WN-6, Neutral, Activity Grade Super I
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, nanopowder, <50 nm particle size (TEM)
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, pore size 58 Å, ~150 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, Brockmann I, activated, standard grade, free-flowing, Redi-Dri
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, powder, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, standard grade, Brockmann I, activated, basic
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, fused, powder, primarily α-phase, 100-200 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, 99.997% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, pellets, 3 mm
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, powder, primarily α phase, ≤10 μm avg. part. size, 99.5% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, fused, powder, primarily α-phase, -325 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, Brockmann I, standard grade, activated, acidic
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, nanoparticles, 30-60 nm particle size (TEM), 20 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, single crystal substrate, <0001>
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, Brockmann I, standard grade, activated, neutral, free-flowing, Redi-Dri
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, activated, Brockmann I, standard grade, neutral
Sigma-Aldrich
Aluminum oxide, Corundum, α-phase, -100 mesh