Skip to Content
Merck
CN
HomeGlycobiologyImproving Glycoform Coverage for Mucin Preparations

Improving Glycoform Coverage for Mucin Preparations

Mucins can be challenging to analyze properly when using traditional tryptic digestion due to their heavily glycosylated domains. Here we explore the use of the mucin-selective proteases, Mucinase StcE and Mucinase SmE, for tryptic-digest sample preparation of two clinically relevant mucin domain macromolecules (MUC16, Podocalyxin and TIM-4) and assess their potential to improve the detection of glycoforms and glycopeptides.

Section Overview

What Is A Mucin?

Proteins containing mucin domains have long-standing clinical relevance. Mucins are a family of large, densely O-glycosylated proteins that are found in and make up much of the mucus secretions and transmembrane glycoproteins of cell surfaces.1 Mucins function as a barrier for epithelial cells and are vital for the lubrication and protection of surfaces. Investigating the biological functions of mucins at the molecular scale is a challenge, as few tools are available to probe mucin domains. The dense glycosylation of these domains can shield probing using traditional techniques like tryptic digest.

Mucins and Cancer

Mucins are thought to play a role in some types of cancer and are even used as a diagnostic marker. MUC16 (length 14507 AA residues, Mass a 1.5MDa) is a large 3-5 million Da transmembrane mucin protein expressed in core glycans. It has densely O- and N-glycosylated domains which make it and other mucins resistant to digestion by proteases. N-linked glycosylation found on MUC16 is primarily high mannose and complex bisecting type N-linked glycans. It contains numerous disulfide bridges that cause the association of several secreted molecules, providing an extraordinarily large gel-like matrix in the extracellular space or the lumen of secretory ducts. CA125, a commonly used biomarker for lung and ovarian cancers, is a peptide epitope of MUC16.3  But its use as a definitive diagnostic marker suffers from insufficient specificity in immunoassays because while it is elevated in ovarian cancer it is present in natural abundance in normal tissues as well, making it difficult to accurately assess. Glycosylation can serve as a 2nd dimension to enhance its specificity as the glycoprofile of CA125 can vary in a disease-dependent manner.4

Podocalyxin (length 558 AA residues, Mass 59 kDa) is another common cancer biomarker.5 It is an anti-adhesive densely O-glycosylated transmembrane sialomucin that has been implicated in the development of more aggressive forms of breast and prostate cancer. It is present in a variety of tissues throughout the body that have tissue-specific glycosylation. This tissue-specific profile can be perturbed in cancer to the extent to which antibody interaction is impacted.6

TIM 4 (length 378 AA residues, Mass 32.7 kDa) T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein family (TIM-1, TIM-3 and TIM-4) are critical regulators of cellular immune responses and have substantial importance in immune-oncology.7

Mucin Glycoprotein Digestion Methods

Works by Malaker, et. al. show that the mucin-selective proteases Mucinase StcE and Mucinase SmE are useful for the analysis of heavily glycosylated mucin domains.2,7 StcE (Secreted protease of C1 esterase inhibitor) from Escherichia coli O157:H7 and SmE (Serratia marcescens enzyme) are bacterial metalloproteases that can be used to digest densely O-glycosylated mucins. The two enzymes have different selectivity and that makes them preferable for different applications.

A two-part diagram illustrating the interaction of proteins with enzymes. Part A shows the enzyme StcE interacting with glycan structures at specific sites (P1, P2, P1'). Part B depicts the enzyme SmE targeting another set of sites (P5, P4, P3, P2, P1, P1', P4', P5') on a substrate, highlighting the specific binding interactions.

Figure 1.Description of consensus sequence and specificity for Mucinase StcE (A) and Mucinase SmE (B).

The Mucinases StcE and SmE digest these mucin glycoproteins into smaller chunks to expose their inner core which may then be accessible to sequencing grade proteases to enhance glycopeptide identification and N- and O-glycosylation characterization. Having tools to probe the glycan occupancy and glycoforms thoroughly are important for developments in glyco-oncology and glycosylation-dependent clinical applications.

Target mucin recombinant proteins Podocalyxin (PODXL) , MUC16 and TIM4 were put through standard tryptic digest preparations including reduction and alkylation with and without pre-treatment with Mucinase StcE or Mucinase SmE. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the pre-treatment test process. Sequence coverage for glycopeptides and several identified glycoforms were then compared between the two conditions.

Schematic of the standard tryptic digest preparation of a mucin glycoprotein with structures including reduction and alkylation with pre-treatment using Mucinase StcE (Product No. SAE0202).

Figure 2. Schematic of the digestion series for Mucinase StcE/Trypsin treatment.

Either Mucinase StcE or Mucinase SmE was used at concentration of 1 μg/μL. Target proteins were prepared by reconstituting 50 μg of the target protein in PBS at 1 μg/μL. The digest with Mucinase StcE or Mucinase SmE was done using a 1:10 Enzyme: Substrate ratio. Specifically, 5 μL of target protein, 1.5 μL of 1% ProteaseMAX™ surfactant (from Promega™ Corporation) in 50 mM NH4HCO3, 6.5 μL of 50 mM NH4HCO3­, and 2 μL of Mucinase StcE or Mucinase SmE (test) or buffer (negative control) were combined and mixed, then incubated at 37 °C for 3 hrs. Samples were then taken through common reduction and alkylation methods using DTT and iodoacetamide before being treated with trypsin. Samples were desalted using SPE cleanup tips, dried, and reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid in water for LC/MS.

Glycoproteomic Analysis

The Glycoproteomic analysis was done using a nanoAcquity UPLC system coupled to the Orbitrap Fusion™ Lumos™ Tribrid™ mass spectrometer with ETD, an nLC-MS/MS system (from Thermo Scientific™). For enhanced DDA glycopeptide fragmentation, three stepped-collision energies were used, and data were acquired with both HCD and EThcD modes for every precursor selected. Raw data were processed using Byonic, MetaMorpheus, and BiopharmaFinder software packages to analyze N- and O-glycosylation and glycoforms. Results were filtered for a maximum of 1% false discovery rate.

Glycoproteomic analysis of Podocalyxin, MUC16 and TIM4 with and without Mucinase StcE or Mucinase SmE pre-treatment was conducted through LC-MS and the number of MS peaks was counted (Figure 3 and Figure 5).

Graph showing the number of peaks in spectra by LC-MS after treatment of Podocalyxin and MUC16 by Trypsin only and by Trypsin + Mucinase StcE (Product No. SAE0202). Podocalyxin had 163 peaks with Trypsin only and 374 peaks with Trypsin + Mucinase StcE, whereas MUC16 had 394 and 487 peaks respectively.

Figure 3.Count of peaks seen in spectra after treatment by Trypsin only and by Trypsin + Mucinase StcE.

Graphs showing the number of N-linked and O-linked glycopeptides and glycoforms identified after treatment of Podocalyxin and MUC16 by Trypsin only and by Trypsin + Mucinase StcE (Product No. SAE0202). Treatment with Mucinase StcE helped identify more N-glycopeptides, N-glycoforms, O-glycopeptides, and O-glycoforms except for N-glycopeptides in MUC16 which was equal and N-glycoforms in Podocalyxin which had less with treatment.

Figure 4.N-linked and O-linked glycopeptides and glycoforms identified after treatment of (A) MUC16 and (B) Podocalyxin with (blue) and without (purple) Mucinase StcE.

The numbers of glycopeptides and glycoforms identified in Podocalyxin and MUC16 with or without Mucinase StcE digestion were determined (Figure 4). MUC16 samples treated with StcE resulted in 23 unique glycopeptides (12 N-linked, 11 O-linked) versus 14 unique glycopeptides (12 N-linked, 2 O-linked) in the untreated samples. Podocalyxin samples treated with StcE resulted in 23 unique glycopeptides (5 N-linked, 18 O-linked) versus 16 glycopeptides (4 N-linked, 12 O-linked) in the untreated samples. MUC16 samples treated with StcE resulted in 88 glycoforms (67 N-linked, 21 O-linked) versus 56 (53 N-linked, 3 O-linked) from untreated. Podocalyxin samples treated with StcE resulted in 260 glycoforms (61 N-linked, 199 O-linked) versus 193 (69 N-linked,124 O-linked) from untreated.

A bar graph comparing the number of glycosites, glycoforms, and IDs identified using different treatments: Trypsin (red), Trypsin + SmE (light blue), and SmE (dark blue). The graph shows that the highest number of IDs (135) was achieved with SmE, while glycosites and glycoforms had lower counts, with Trypsin showing the least effectiveness across all categories.

Figure 5.Glycosites and Glycoform identified after treatment of TIM4 with SmE alone (dark blue bars), treatment with SmE + Trypsin, (pale blue bars) and treatment with Trypsin only (red bars).

The number of glycopeptides and glycoforms identified in TIM-4 with or without Mucinase SmE digestion was determined (Figure 4). TIM-4 treated with only SmE resulted in a high increase (19 unique glycosites, 48 unique glycoforms and 135 unique IDs for each protein per amino acid position) versus treatment only with Trypsin or Trypsin + Mucinase SmE.

Implications of Biomarker Testing in Mucosal Tissue Samples

Digestion of mucin-type glycoproteins with Mucinase StcE prior to glycoproteomic analysis shows an increase in the number of glycopeptides identified and a very strong increase in the number of glycoforms identified. This is presumably because the smaller glycopeptides formed from the Mucinase StcE digestion are more accessible to trypsin and/or high-energy collision. When using Mucinase SmE the number of identified peptides can surplus the number of peptides identified when digestion is followed by a tryptic digest.  While untested, this would likely apply to other enzymatic treatments including enzymatic glycan release and other specific endoproteases (e.g., EndoLysC, EndoArgC, etc.) useful for glycomics and proteomics work. These results suggest that the preparation of mucosal tissue samples used for biomarker testing may yield more information and increased signal if treated with Mucinase StcE or Mucinase SmE prior to glycomics and proteomics workflows. It also provides a unique platform for rapid and comprehensive analysis of site-specific glycosylation in complex proteins or mixtures.

Related Products

Loading

References

1.
Cummings, R.D. VA, Esko, J. D., Freeze, H. H., P. S, C. R. B, G. W. H, M. E., Eds E. 2009. Essentials of Glycobiology. 2nd. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
2.
Malaker SA, Pedram K, Ferracane MJ, Bensing BA, Krishnan V, Pett C, Yu J, Woods EC, Kramer JR, Westerlind U, et al. 2019. The mucin-selective protease StcE enables molecular and functional analysis of human cancer-associated mucins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.. 116(15):7278-7287. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813020116
3.
Felder M, Kapur A, Gonzalez-Bosquet J, Horibata S, Heintz J, Albrecht R, Fass L, Kaur J, Hu K, Shojaei H, et al. 2014. MUC16 (CA125): tumor biomarker to cancer therapy, a work in progress. Mol Cancer. 13(1): https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-13-129
4.
Bayoumy S, Hyytiä H, Leivo J, Talha SM, Huhtinen K, Poutanen M, Hynninen J, Perheentupa A, Lamminmäki U, Gidwani K, et al. Glycovariant-based lateral flow immunoassay to detect ovarian cancer–associated serum CA125. Commun Biol. 3(1): https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01191-x
5.
Nielsen JS, McNagny KM. 2009. The Role of Podocalyxin in Health and Disease. 20(8):1669-1676. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2008070782
6.
Canals Hernaez D, Hughes MR, Dean P, Bergqvist P, Samudio I, Blixt O, Wiedemeyer K, Li Y, Bond C, Cruz E, et al. 2020. PODO447: a novel antibody to a tumor-restricted epitope on the cancer antigen podocalyxin. J Immunother Cancer. 8(2):e001128. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001128
7.
Chongsaritsinsuk J, Steigmeyer AD, Mahoney KE, Rosenfeld MA, Lucas TM, Smith CM, Li A, Ince D, Kearns FL, Battison AS, et al. Glycoproteomic landscape and structural dynamics of TIM family immune checkpoints enabled by mucinase SmE. Nat Commun. 14(1): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41756-y
Sign In To Continue

To continue reading please sign in or create an account.

Don't Have An Account?