Skip to Content
Merck
CN

357545

Nickel

foil, thickness 1.0 mm, 99.98%

Sign In to View Organizational & Contract Pricing.

Select a Size

Change View

About This Item

Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
Ni
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
58.69
UNSPSC Code:
12352300
PubChem Substance ID:
EC Number:
231-111-4
MDL number:
Technical Service
Need help? Our team of experienced scientists is here for you.
Let Us Assist


assay

99.98%

form

foil

resistivity

6.97 μΩ-cm, 20°C

thickness

1.0 mm

bp

2732 °C (lit.)

mp

1453 °C (lit.)

density

8.9 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.)

SMILES string

[Ni]

InChI

1S/Ni

InChI key

PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N



Regulatory Information

新产品

This item has



Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number

Don't see the Right Version?

If you require a particular version, you can look up a specific certificate by the Lot or Batch number.

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library



Ornella Valenti et al.
Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 19(3), 658-674 (2008-07-18)
The prefrontal cortex receives multiple inputs from the hippocampal complex, which are thought to drive memory-guided behavior. Moreover, dysfunctions of both regions have been repeatedly associated with several psychiatric disorders. Therefore, understanding the interconnections and modulatory interactions between these regions
Marilia O S Seijo et al.
Journal of dental education, 77(5), 648-655 (2013-05-10)
Including students' perceptions in the educational process is considered a key component in monitoring the quality of academic programs. This study aimed to evaluate the concept of one's learning experience in endodontic teaching from the perspective of a group of
A J Feilzer et al.
Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde, 120(6), 335-341 (2013-07-19)
Orally applied metal alloys can cause undesirable physical effects. A distinction needs to be made in this respect between local and systemic reactions and toxic and immunological reactions. A case is presented which illustrates this problem. In this case, the