Skip to Content
Merck
CN

34374

1,2,3,4-Tetrachloro-5-nitrobenzene

PESTANAL®, analytical standard

Sign In to View Organizational & Contract Pricing.

Select a Size

Change View

About This Item

Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
C6HCl4NO2
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
260.89
EC Number:
212-906-5
UNSPSC Code:
41116107
PubChem Substance ID:
Beilstein/REAXYS Number:
2273256
MDL number:
Technical Service
Need help? Our team of experienced scientists is here for you.
Let Us Assist


grade

analytical standard

product line

PESTANAL®

shelf life

limited shelf life, expiry date on the label

technique(s)

HPLC: suitable, gas chromatography (GC): suitable

application(s)

agriculture
environmental

format

neat

SMILES string

[O-][N+](=O)c1cc(Cl)c(Cl)c(Cl)c1Cl

InChI

1S/C6HCl4NO2/c7-2-1-3(11(12)13)5(9)6(10)4(2)8/h1H

InChI key

MTBYTWZDRVOMBR-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Application

Refer to the product′s Certificate of Analysis for more information on a suitable instrument technique. Contact Technical Service for further support.

Legal Information

PESTANAL is a registered trademark of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany


pictograms

Exclamation markEnvironment

signalword

Warning

Hazard Classifications

Acute Tox. 4 Oral - Aquatic Acute 1 - Aquatic Chronic 1 - Skin Sens. 1

Storage Class

11 - Combustible Solids

wgk

WGK 3

flash_point_f

Not applicable

flash_point_c

Not applicable

ppe

dust mask type N95 (US), Eyeshields, Gloves

Regulatory Information

农药列管产品

This item has



Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number

It looks like we've run into a problem, but you can still download Certificates of Analysis from our Documents section.

If you need assistance, please contact Customer Support

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library



James C Salamanca et al.
Scientific reports, 8(1), 7559-7559 (2018-05-17)
E-cigarette aerosol emission studies typically focus on benchmarking toxicant levels versus those of cigarettes. However, such studies do not fully account for the distinct chemical makeup of e-liquids and their unique properties. These approaches often conclude that there are fewer