Skip to Content
Merck
CN

Y0001297

Iopentol

European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard

Synonym(s):

5-[Acetyl(2-hydroxy-3-methylpropyl)amino]-N,N′-bis(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-2,4,6-triiodo-1,3-benzenedicarboxamide

Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing

Select a Size

About This Item

Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
C20H28I3N3O9
CAS Number:
89797-00-2
Molecular Weight:
835.16
UNSPSC Code:
41116107
NACRES:
NA.24

Key Documents

View All Documentation
Technical Service
Need help? Our team of experienced scientists is here for you.
Let Us Assist
Technical Service
Need help? Our team of experienced scientists is here for you.
Let Us Assist

grade

pharmaceutical primary standard

API family

iopentol

manufacturer/tradename

EDQM

application(s)

pharmaceutical (small molecule)

format

neat

storage temp.

2-8°C

SMILES string

Ic1c(c(c(c(c1C(=O)NCC(O)CO)I)C(=O)NCC(O)CO)I)N(CC(O)COC)C(=O)C

InChI

1S/C20H28I3N3O9/c1-9(29)26(5-12(32)8-35-2)18-16(22)13(19(33)24-3-10(30)6-27)15(21)14(17(18)23)20(34)25-4-11(31)7-28/h10-12,27-28,30-32H,3-8H2,1-2H3,(H,24,33)(H,25,34)

InChI key

IUNJANQVIJDFTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N

Looking for similar products? Visit Product Comparison Guide

Related Categories

General description

This product is provided as delivered and specified by the issuing Pharmacopoeia. All information provided in support of this product, including SDS and any product information leaflets have been developed and issued under the Authority of the issuing Pharmacopoeia.For further information and support please go to the website of the issuing Pharmacopoeia.

Application

Iopentol EP Reference standard, intended for use in laboratory tests only as specifically prescribed in the European Pharmacopoeia.

Packaging

The product is delivered as supplied by the issuing Pharmacopoeia. For the current unit quantity, please visit the EDQM reference substance catalogue.

Other Notes

Sales restrictions may apply.

Storage Class Code

11 - Combustible Solids

WGK

WGK 1

Flash Point(F)

Not applicable

Flash Point(C)

Not applicable

Choose from one of the most recent versions:

Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Lot/Batch Number

It looks like we've run into a problem, but you can still download Certificates of Analysis from our Documents section.

If you need assistance, please contact Customer Support

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

L Martí-Bonmatí et al.
Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987), 47(1), 10-14 (2006-02-28)
To analyze the influence of different biphasic and monophasic injection rate protocols in abdominal computed tomography (CT). A randomized, consecutive, parallel group study was designed and conducted in 60 patients studied with the same CT helical protocol. Patients were randomly
Philipp J Schaefer et al.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 30(3), 376-382 (2007-02-06)
The objective of the study was to prove the value of single-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography [three-dimensional (3D) ceMRA] in abdominal and iliac arteries versus the reference standard intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (i.a.DSA) when indicating a therapy. Patients suspected of
P Rathsmann et al.
RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin, 176(12), 1826-1831 (2004-12-02)
We examined the subjective compatibility of elderly patients who received the intravenous contrast medium Iopentol (Imagopaquetrade mark 300). In addition, objective data were aquired to show possible interactions between contrast media and organ systems in old patients. A CT scan
F Jung et al.
The Journal of invasive cardiology, 11(1), 2-8 (2000-04-04)
This single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind phase IV study in parallel-group design was carried out to investigate whether either of two different x-ray contrast media (iomeprol 350 or iopentol 350) injected into the axillary artery has any influence on cutaneous microcirculation.
Volkmar Lufft et al.
European radiology, 12(4), 804-809 (2002-04-18)
The aim of this study was to compare renal function between patients with renal angiography and patients with renal angiography and angioplasty (AP) for renal artery stenosis (RAS). Forty-seven patients with suspected RAS were prospectively investigated by digital subtraction angiography
View All Related Papers

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service