Skip to Content
Merck
CN

Burn Scar Biomechanics after Pressure Garment Therapy.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery (2015-05-20)
Jayne Y Kim, James J Willard, Dorothy M Supp, Sashwati Roy, Gayle M Gordillo, Chandan K Sen, Heather M Powell
ABSTRACT

The current standard of care for the prevention and treatment of scarring after burn injury is pressure garment therapy. Although this therapy has been used clinically for many years, controversy remains regarding its efficacy. The authors evaluated the efficacy of pressure garment therapy in a female red Duroc pig burn model in which wound depth could be tightly controlled. Full-thickness burn wounds were generated on female red Duroc pigs. At day 28 after burn, pressure garment therapy was applied to half the wounds (10 mmHg), with control wounds covered with garments that exerted no compression. Scar area, perfusion, hardness, and elasticity were quantified at days 0, 28, 42, 56, and 72 using computerized planimetry, laser Doppler, and torsional ballistometry. Scar morphology was assessed at days 28, 56, and 76 using histology, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. Pressure garment therapy significantly hindered scar contraction, with control scars contracting to 64.6 percent + 13.9 percent original area at day 72, whereas pressure garment therapy scars contracted to 82.7 percent + 17.9 percent original area. Pressure garments significantly reduced skin hardness and increased skin strength by 1.3 times. No difference in perfusion or blood vessel density was observed. The average collagen fiber diameter was greater in control burns than in pressure garment therapy. Pressure garment therapy was effective at reducing scar contraction and improving biomechanics compared with control scars. These results confirm the efficacy of pressure garments and highlight the need to further investigate the role of pressure magnitude and the time of therapy application to enhance efficacy for optimal biomechanics and patient mobility.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, 50 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
D.E.R.® 332, used as embedding medium
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaric dialdehyde solution, 50 wt. % in H2O, FCC
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol Fixative 80% v/v, suitable for fixing solution (blood films)
Supelco
Ethanol standards 10% (v/v), 10 % (v/v) in H2O, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, 50% in H2O, suitable for photographic applications
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 25% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 50% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative or other sophisticated use
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 8% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative or other sophisticated use
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade II, 25% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 70% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative or other sophisticated use
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, ACS spectrophotometric grade, 95.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, anhydrous, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, ACS reagent, meets USP testing specifications, Excise Tax-free, Permit for use required
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 160 proof, Excise Tax-free, Permit for use required
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, ACS reagent, meets USP testing specifications, Excise Tax-free, Permit for use required