Merck
CN
  • Development and comparison of two multi-residue methods for the analysis of select pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Development and comparison of two multi-residue methods for the analysis of select pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Talanta (2015-06-07)
Yuanbo Li, Rebecca A Kelley, Troy D Anderson, Michael J Lydy
ABSTRACT

One of the hypotheses that may help explain the loss of honey bee colonies worldwide is the increasing potential for exposure of honey bees to complex mixtures of pesticides. To better understand this phenomenon, two multi-residue methods based on different extraction and cleanup procedures have been developed, and compared for the determination of 11 relevant pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry. Sample preparatory methods included solvent extraction followed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) cleanup and cleanup using a dispersive solid-phase extraction with zirconium-based sorbents (Z-Sep). Matrix effects, method detection limits, recoveries, and reproducibility were evaluated and compared. Method detection limits (MDL) of the pesticides for the GPC method in honey bees, pollen, and wax ranged from 0.65 to 5.92 ng/g dw, 0.56 to 6.61 ng/g dw, and 0.40 to 8.30 ng/g dw, respectively, while MDLs for the Z-Sep method were from 0.33 to 4.47 ng/g dw, 0.42 to 5.37 ng/g dw, and 0.51 to 5.34 ng/g dw, respectively. The mean recoveries in all matrices and at three spiking concentrations ranged from 64.4% to 149.5% and 71.9% to 126.2% for the GPC and Z-Sep methods, with relative standard deviation between 1.5-25.3% and 1.3-15.9%, respectively. The results showed that the Z-Sep method was more suitable for the determination of the target pesticides, especially chlorothalonil, in bee hive samples. The Z-Sep method was then validated using a series of field-collected bee hive samples taken from honey bee colonies in Virginia.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, natural, ≥97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, ≥99%, meets FCC analytical specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid-12C2, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluoroethylene), powder, >40 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluoroethylene), powder (free-flowing), 1 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
Hexane, anhydrous, 95%
Sigma-Aldrich
4,4′-Bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,1′-biphenyl, sublimed grade, 99.9% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, natural, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep/C18 Tube, centrifuge tube volume 2 mL, pack of 100
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluoroethylene), powder, 200 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluoroethylene), powder, 35 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluoroethylene), powder (free-flowing), ≤12 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluoroethylene), beads
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluoroethylene), powder, ≥350 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
4,4′-Bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,1′-biphenyl, 97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, anhydrous, ≥99.8%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.8%
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep/C18 Tube, pk of 50, centrifuge tube volume 15 mL , Shaker Compatible
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep+ Tube, centrifuge tube volume 2 mL, pack of 100 ea
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep+ Tube, pk of 50, centrifuge tube volume 15 mL , Shaker Compatible
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep Tube, pk of 50, centrifuge tube volume 15 mL , Shaker Compatible
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep+ Bulk, pkg of 20 g
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep Tube, centrifuge tube volume 2 mL, pack of 100 ea
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep+ with MgSO4 Tube, pk of 50, centrifuge tube volume 15 mL , Shaker Compatible