Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Effect of facial material softness and applied force on face mask dead volume, face mask seal, and inhaled corticosteroid delivery through an idealized infant replica.

Effect of facial material softness and applied force on face mask dead volume, face mask seal, and inhaled corticosteroid delivery through an idealized infant replica.

Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery (2013-11-14)
Nicholas B Carrigy, Connor O'Reilly, James Schmitt, Michelle Noga, Warren H Finlay
ABSTRACT

During the aerosol delivery device design and optimization process, in vitro lung dose (LD) measurements are often performed using soft face models, which may provide a more clinically relevant representation of face mask dead volume (MDV) and face mask seal (FMS) than hard face models. However, a comparison of MDV, FMS, and LD for hard and soft face models is lacking. Metal, silicone, and polyurethane represented hard, soft, and very soft facial materials, respectively. MDV was measured using a water displacement technique. FMS was measured using a valved holding chamber (VHC) flow rate technique. The LD of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) delivered via a 100-μg Qvar® pressurized metered dose inhaler with AeroChamber Plus® Flow-Vu® VHC and Small Mask, defined as that which passes through the nasal airways of the idealized infant geometry, was measured using a bias tidal flow system with a filter. MDV, FMS, and LD were measured at 1.5 lb and 3.5 lb of applied force. A mathematical model was used to predict LD based on experimental measurements of MDV and FMS. Experimental BDP LD measurements for ABS, silicone, and polyurethane at 1.5 lb were 0.9 (0.6) μg, 2.4 (1.9) μg, and 19.3 (0.9) μg, respectively. At 3.5 lb, the respective LD was 10.0 (1.5) μg, 13.8 (1.4) μg, and 14.2 (0.9) μg. Parametric analysis with the mathematical model showed that differences in FMS between face models had a greater impact on LD than differences in MDV. The use of soft face models resulted in higher LD than hard face models, with a greater difference at 1.5 lb than at 3.5 lb. A lack of a FMS led to decreased dose consistency; therefore, a sealant should be used when measuring LD with a hard ABS or soft silicone face model at 1.5 lb of applied force or less.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Supelco
Dichloromethane, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, HPLC Plus, for HPLC, GC, and residue analysis, ≥99.9%, contains 50-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, anhydrous, ≥99.8%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Supelco
Dichloromethane, Selectophore, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.8%, contains amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., NF, ≥99% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, reag. ISO, ≥99.9% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichloromethane, biotech. grade, 99.9%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Supelco
Methylene Chloride, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material