Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Evaluation and comparison of 1,2-indanedione and 1,8-diazafluoren-9-one solutions for the enhancement of latent fingerprints on porous surfaces.

Evaluation and comparison of 1,2-indanedione and 1,8-diazafluoren-9-one solutions for the enhancement of latent fingerprints on porous surfaces.

Forensic science international (2015-08-10)
Valentina D'Elia, Stefano Materazzi, Gianpaolo Iuliano, Luca Niola
ABSTRACT

1,2-indanedione (1,2-IND) and 1,8-diazafluoren-9-one (DFO) are used in the forensic field to enhance latent fingerprints deposited on porous surfaces due to the formation of fluorescent products by reacting with the amino acids present in the papillary exudate. The study was carried out in collaboration with the Fingerprints and Photography Section of the Carabinieri Scientific Investigation Department (RIS) of Rome, in which laboratories, until now, DFO has been the most used because of its excellent enhancing properties, even if it is more expensive and relatively toxic in comparison with the 1,2-IND. The aim of this work was then to evaluate and to compare the effectiveness of three solutions of 1,2-IND in different formulations and a DFO solution employed as single enhancing treatments, in order to assess whether it was possible to replace a reagent with the other obtaining equally satisfying results. In this case, white office paper was selected as deposit surface since it also permitted one to observe those reaction products that appear visible to a naked eye. Beside to a qualitative study of the visual characteristic of the enhanced fingerprints, further quantitative studies were conducted on the intensity of fluorescence of the products and on the consumption of amino acids during the reaction. The analyses, which at first were conducted on standard samples, were then repeated on real samples to validate the results obtained. The DFO confirmed its excellent enhancement properties, but also one of the three solutions of 1,2-IND showed comparable properties in terms of enhanced fingerprint definition and stability over time from the completion of a crime. As a result, we proved that a selected 1,2-IND formulation may replace with satisfactory achievements the DFO solution currently employed, providing also advantages from the point of view of safety and cost savings.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid-12C2, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, suitable for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol Fixative 80% v/v, suitable for fixing solution (blood films)
Supelco
Ethanol standards 10% (v/v), 10 % (v/v) in H2O, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, purification grade, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, anhydrous, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, natural, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, ACS spectrophotometric grade, 95.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol solution, contains 0.50 % (v/v) triethylamine
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 190 proof, ACS reagent, meets USP testing specifications, Excise Tax-free, Permit for use required
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 160 proof, Excise Tax-free, Permit for use required
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 200 proof, ACS reagent, meets USP testing specifications, Excise Tax-free, Permit for use required