Merck
CN
  • The 104-week efficacy and safety of telbivudine-based optimization strategy in chronic hepatitis B patients: a randomized, controlled study.

The 104-week efficacy and safety of telbivudine-based optimization strategy in chronic hepatitis B patients: a randomized, controlled study.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) (2014-01-03)
Jian Sun, Qing Xie, Deming Tan, Qin Ning, Junqi Niu, Xuefan Bai, Rong Fan, Shijun Chen, Jun Cheng, Yanyan Yu, Hao Wang, Min Xu, Guangfeng Shi, Mobin Wan, Xinyue Chen, Hong Tang, Jifang Sheng, Xiaoguang Dou, Junping Shi, Hong Ren, Maorong Wang, Hongfei Zhang, Zhiliang Gao, Chengwei Chen, Hong Ma, Jidong Jia, Jinlin Hou
摘要

An optimization strategy based on the Roadmap concept is supposed to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with suboptimal antiviral response. The aim of this study was to prove the concept with a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study. In all, 606 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive, nucleos(t)ide-naive chronic hepatitis B patients were randomized to the Optimize or Mono group. Patients in the Optimize group were treated with telbivudine for 24 weeks, after which those suboptimal responders with HBV DNA ≥300 copies/mL at week 24 received telbivudine plus adefovir until week 104, while the early virological responders continued telbivudine monotherapy. Patients in the Mono group received telbivudine monotherapy. All patients with telbivudine monotherapy had adefovir added if viral breakthrough developed. Sixty-eight percent (204/300) of patients in the Optimize group had adefovir added due to suboptimal response. At week 104, compared to the Mono group, more patients in the Optimize group achieved HBV DNA <300 copies/ml (76.7% versus 61.2%, P < 0.001) with less genotypic resistance (2.7% versus 25.8%, P < 0.001). The rates of HBeAg seroconversion and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization were comparable between the two groups (23.7% versus 22.1%; 80.7% versus 79.2%). For week 24 suboptimal responders, telbivudine plus adefovir showed an additive antiviral potency, with 71.1% achieving virological response at week 104 and only 0.5% developing genotypic resistance, compared with 46.6% who achieved virological response and 37.8% who developed genotypic resistance with telbivudine monotherapy. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated, with an observed persistent increase of the glomerular filtration rate. For suboptimal virological responders to telbivudine at week 24, adjusting the treatment strategy is recommended. Adding adefovir can benefit these patients with additive antiviral potency and low resistance without increased side effects.

材料
货号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
胸苷, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
腺嘌呤, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
胸苷, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
腺嘌呤, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
胸苷, ≥99.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
腺嘌呤, BioReagent, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥99%
Supelco
腺嘌呤, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
阿德福韦, ≥98% (HPLC)
腺嘌呤, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
胸苷, Vetec, reagent grade, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
腺嘌呤, Vetec, reagent grade, ≥99%