The Use of Perovskite Metal Complexes in Photovoltaic Cells

PV cells with spiro-MeOTAD

In 2012, Kim et al. reported that the stability issue of perovskite complexes in electrolyte solutions can be resolved by using a solid state hole transport layer (HTL) such as N²,N²,N^2′,N^2′,N⁷,N⁷,N^7′,N^7′-octakis(4- methoxyphenyl)-9,9′-spirobi[9H-fluorene]-2,2′,7,7′-tetramine (spiro-MeOTAD, 792071).¹⁴ PV cells in this study showed a V_oc that is dependent on the TiO₂ film thickness (0.6–1.4 μm) and with the thinnest TiO₂ film, 0.6 μm, a PCE of 9.7% was obtained. Surprisingly, an added HTL is not necessary for constructing a working perovskite PV cell; Etgar et al. showed that hole conductor-free perovskite PV cells made with a gold counter electrode deposited directly onto MAIP gave a PCE of 5.5% under AM1.5G light at 1000 W/m² and 7.28% at 100 W/m².¹⁵ Further progress was made in 2012 when Lee et al. reported an all solid state PV cell constructed with a perovskite formed from a precursor solution of PbCl₂ and methylammonium iodide (MAI) in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and an HTL of spiro-MeOTAD. This PV cell had a measured PCE close to 8%.¹⁶ This study also revealed that the TiO₂ n-type semiconductor could be replaced by the electrically-insulating Al₂O₃, which gave an increase in PCE to 10.9%. Although the active perovskite in this study was referred to as (CH₃NH₃)PbI₂Cl, it was later discovered that the active perovskite in this case was likely chloride-doped methylammonium triiodoplumbate [(CH₃NH₃)Pb(I_3-xCl_x), CMAIP].¹⁷ Although spiro-MeOTAD was an early HTL material used in all solid state perovskite PV cells, other HTL materials have been used as well.^{18,19,20,21,22}

Perovskite deposition techniques

Literature reports suggest that the performance of perovskite-based PV cells depend on the deposition technique used to form the perovskite layer. For example, a PCE of 12.6%–15.0% was accomplished by Burschka et al. by forming the active perovskite layer stepwise instead of from a precursor solution containing both MAI and an inorganic lead source.²³ In this study, PbI₂ was first deposited onto a 350 nm thin film of TiO₂ from a 1 M solution in DMF, and the subsequent reaction with MAI as a solution in 2-propanol formed the active perovskite material. Liu et al. has reported that active perovskite layers can be crafted by simultaneous vapor deposition of PbCl₂ and MAI at 10⁻⁵ mbar.²⁴ It was found that the cell with the perovskite layer fabricated using vapor deposition yielded a PCE of 15.4% whereas the one prepared using solution processing of PbCl₂ and MAI in DMF showed a PCE of 8.4%.²⁵ Vapor deposition of just the ammonium salt MAI onto solution deposited PbI₂ has also been reported.²⁶ It was later shown by Jeon et al. that bromide-doped methylammonium triiodoplumbate [(CH₃NH₃)Pb(I_3-xBr_x) x = 0.1-0.15, BMAIP]²⁷ deposited as a solution in γ-butyrolactone (γ-BL) containing added dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) could give PV cells with a PCE of 16.2%. In this case the formation of a uniform and high density perovskite layer through an intermediate DMSO complex was reported to be important in the high measured PCE.²⁸ These studies have shown that the active perovskite layer can be formed using a variety of techniques and choice of deposition method plays an important role in the performance of the PV devices.

New materials for higher PCE

Various combinations of the component materials used in PV cells have been tried in recent years with the aim of increasing the PCE. In 2014, Zhou et al. report that by using yttrium-doped TiO2 (YTO) as the electron transport layer (ETL), polyethyleneimine 80% ethoxylated (PEIE) modified indium tin oxide (ITO) as the anode, and carefully controlling the humidity during solution deposition of CMAIP yields a device with a maximum PCE of 19.3%.²⁹ However, the average device in their study had a PCE of 16.6%, and it should be noted that the high PCE was measured using a reverse bias scan, which over estimate PCE because of a hysteresis in the current-voltage (J-V) characteristics.³⁰ Excluding the overestimations from only using the reverse bias scan, the best PCE under standard AM1.5G is 17.9% as reported by Jeon et al..⁸ In this report they used poly(triaryl amine) (PTAA) as the HTL instead of spiro-MeOTAD and the mixed perovskite MABP and formamidinium triiodoplumbate (FAIP) in a molar ratio of FAIP/MABP 17:3 as the photoactive material. In just under 6 years from the discovery of perovskites as viable light absorbing materials for use in PV devices, PCEs of these devices have nearly reached that of low cost silicon PV cells.