Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Effects of two different rearing protocols for Holstein bull calves in the first 3 weeks of life on health status, metabolism and subsequent performance.

Effects of two different rearing protocols for Holstein bull calves in the first 3 weeks of life on health status, metabolism and subsequent performance.

Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition (2014-08-15)
P Maccari, S Wiedemann, H-J Kunz, M Piechotta, P Sanftleben, M Kaske
ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of weight gain of calves within the first 3 weeks of life on health status and subsequent performance. Holstein bull calves were reared either intensively (IR; individual hutches and ad libitum milk feeding for the first 3 weeks of life; n = 24), or according to the established protocol [ER; 4 l milk/day in hutches during week 1 and 720 g/day milk replacer (MR) from day 8 to 21 in a group pen; n = 24]. Water, hay and concentrates were freely available to all calves. From week 4, calves of both groups were housed together in a group pen and fed 720 g MR/day; step-down weaning was performed between week 5 and 10. Key metabolic blood parameters were analysed on day 2, 12, 21 and 70 of life. After weaning, all animals were fed concentrates and corn silage until slaughter at an age of 8 months. Within the first 3 weeks, average daily weight gain was threefold higher in IR calves in relation to ER calves (1.28 vs. 0.38 kg/day, p < 0.001). Neither incidence nor duration of scouring differed significantly between groups. Starter intake (week 4-10) was higher in IR calves in relation to ER calves (49.7 vs. 38.0 kg/calf, p = 0.006). Serum glucose, urea, albumin and insulin were higher at an age of 21 days in IR calves in relation to ER calves; no differences were obvious at an age of 70 days. Plasma GH and IGF-I concentrations revealed an uncoupling of the somatotropic axis in ER calves within the first 3 weeks of life. At slaughter, body weight of IR calves tended to be higher than that of the ER calves (320 vs. 309 kg, p = 0.07). In conclusion, intensive feeding and individual housing during the first 3 weeks of life had positive long-term effects on subsequent performance.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Urea-12C, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
SyntheChol® NS0 Supplement, 500 ×, synthetic cholesterol, animal component-free, sterile-filtered, aqueous solution, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea solution, 40 % (w/v) in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, Sigma Grade, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Cholesterol, from sheep wool, ≥92.5% (GC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea solution, BioUltra, ~8 M in H2O
SAFC
Cholesterol, from sheep wool, Controlled origin, meets USP/NF testing specifications
Supelco
Urea, 8 M (after reconstitution with 16 mL high purity water)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, reag. Ph. Eur., ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ACS reagent, 99.0-100.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, BioUltra, Molecular Biology, 99% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, BioXtra, pH 7.5-9.5 (20 °C, 5 M in H2O)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%, pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, suitable for electrophoresis
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, powder, BioReagent, Molecular Biology, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, USP, 99.0-100.5%, 99.0-101.0% (calc. on dry substance)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, Vetec, reagent grade, 99%