跳转至内容
Merck
CN
  • A randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious uveitis.

A randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious uveitis.

Ophthalmology (2014-06-12)
Sivakumar R Rathinam, Manohar Babu, Radhika Thundikandy, Anuradha Kanakath, Natalie Nardone, Elizabeth Esterberg, Salena M Lee, Wayne T A Enanoria, Travis C Porco, Erica N Browne, Rachel Weinrib, Nisha R Acharya
摘要

To compare the relative effectiveness of methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis. Multicenter, block-randomized, observer-masked clinical trial. Eighty patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing therapy at Aravind Eye Hospitals in Madurai and Coimbatore, India. Patients were randomized to receive 25 mg weekly oral methotrexate or 1 g twice daily oral mycophenolate mofetil and were monitored monthly for 6 months. Oral prednisone and topical corticosteroids were tapered. Masked examiners assessed the primary outcome of treatment success, defined by achieving the following at 5 and 6 months: (1) ≤0.5+ anterior chamber cells, ≤0.5+ vitreous cells, ≤0.5+ vitreous haze and no active retinal/choroidal lesions in both eyes, (2) ≤10 mg of prednisone and ≤2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1% a day, and (3) no declaration of treatment failure because of intolerability or safety. Additional outcomes included time to sustained corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation, change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, resolution of macular edema, adverse events, subgroup analysis by anatomic location, and medication adherence. Forty-one patients were randomized to methotrexate and 39 to mycophenolate mofetil. A total of 67 patients (35 methotrexate, 32 mycophenolate mofetil) contributed to the primary outcome. Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved treatment success with methotrexate and 47% with mycophenolate mofetil (P = 0.09). Treatment failure from adverse events or tolerability was not different by treatment arm (P = 0.99). There were no differences between treatment groups in time to corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation (P = 0.44), change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.68), or resolution of macular edema (P = 0.31). There was no statistically significant difference in corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation between patients receiving methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. However, there was a 22% difference in treatment success favoring methotrexate.

材料
Product Number
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤 水合物, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤 水合物, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤, meets USP testing specifications
SAFC
甲氨蝶呤
Supelco
甲氨蝶呤, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
USP
霉酚酸酯, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Supelco
甲氨蝶呤,1 X 100MG 溶液, 1.0 mg/mL in methanol with 0.1N NaOH, ampule of 1 mL, certified reference material, Cerilliant®
甲氨蝶呤, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Supelco
霉酚酸标准液 CRM 溶液, 1.0 mg/mL in acetonitrile, ampule of 1 mL, certified reference material, Cerilliant®
Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤 水合物, ≥99.0% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
霉酚酸酯, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
甲氨蝶呤, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
吗替麦考酚酯, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
甲氨蝶呤, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard