跳转至内容
Merck
CN
  • Effect of facial material softness and applied force on face mask dead volume, face mask seal, and inhaled corticosteroid delivery through an idealized infant replica.

Effect of facial material softness and applied force on face mask dead volume, face mask seal, and inhaled corticosteroid delivery through an idealized infant replica.

Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery (2013-11-14)
Nicholas B Carrigy, Connor O'Reilly, James Schmitt, Michelle Noga, Warren H Finlay
摘要

During the aerosol delivery device design and optimization process, in vitro lung dose (LD) measurements are often performed using soft face models, which may provide a more clinically relevant representation of face mask dead volume (MDV) and face mask seal (FMS) than hard face models. However, a comparison of MDV, FMS, and LD for hard and soft face models is lacking. Metal, silicone, and polyurethane represented hard, soft, and very soft facial materials, respectively. MDV was measured using a water displacement technique. FMS was measured using a valved holding chamber (VHC) flow rate technique. The LD of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) delivered via a 100-μg Qvar® pressurized metered dose inhaler with AeroChamber Plus® Flow-Vu® VHC and Small Mask, defined as that which passes through the nasal airways of the idealized infant geometry, was measured using a bias tidal flow system with a filter. MDV, FMS, and LD were measured at 1.5 lb and 3.5 lb of applied force. A mathematical model was used to predict LD based on experimental measurements of MDV and FMS. Experimental BDP LD measurements for ABS, silicone, and polyurethane at 1.5 lb were 0.9 (0.6) μg, 2.4 (1.9) μg, and 19.3 (0.9) μg, respectively. At 3.5 lb, the respective LD was 10.0 (1.5) μg, 13.8 (1.4) μg, and 14.2 (0.9) μg. Parametric analysis with the mathematical model showed that differences in FMS between face models had a greater impact on LD than differences in MDV. The use of soft face models resulted in higher LD than hard face models, with a greater difference at 1.5 lb than at 3.5 lb. A lack of a FMS led to decreased dose consistency; therefore, a sealant should be used when measuring LD with a hard ABS or soft silicone face model at 1.5 lb of applied force or less.

材料
产品编号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.8%, contains amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, HPLC Plus, for HPLC, GC, and residue analysis, ≥99.9%, contains 50-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, anhydrous, ≥99.8%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, reag. ISO, ≥99.9% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., NF, ≥99% (GC)
Supelco
二氯甲烷, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Supelco
二氯甲烷, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
二氯甲烷, biotech. grade, 99.9%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Supelco
二氯甲烷, Selectophore, ≥99.5%