Merck
CN
  • Mycophenolate mofetil vs. methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host-disease--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host-disease--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leukemia research (2014-01-15)
Ron Ram, Moshe Yeshurun, Liat Vidal, Ofer Shpilberg, Anat Gafter-Gvili
摘要

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all trials comparing MMF and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis. Our search yielded 11 studies; 3 were randomized-control trials (RCTs). While the incidence of grades 2-4 acute GVHD was comparable, the incidence of grades 3 and 4 acute GVHD was higher in patients given MMF (RR 1.61; 95% CI 1.18-2.30). Incidence of mucositis was lower (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.25-0.49) and time to engraftment was shorter (mean difference (-3.6); 95% CI -5.5 to -1.7) in patients given MMF. All other analyzed transplantation outcomes were comparable. We conclude that MMF, compared to methotrexate, is associated with increased severity of acute GVHD. Robustness of these results is hampered by the small number of RCTs.

材料
货号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤 水合物, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤 水合物, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤 水合物, ≥99.0% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
USP
霉酚酸酯, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
霉酚酸酯, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
吗替麦考酚酯, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard