跳转至内容
Merck
CN
  • Comparative effectiveness of less commonly used systemic monotherapies and common combination therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis in the clinical setting.

Comparative effectiveness of less commonly used systemic monotherapies and common combination therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis in the clinical setting.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2014-09-28)
Junko Takeshita, Shuwei Wang, Daniel B Shin, Kristina Callis Duffin, Gerald G Krueger, Robert E Kalb, Jamie D Weisman, Brian R Sperber, Michael B Stierstorfer, Bruce A Brod, Stephen M Schleicher, Andrew D Robertson, Kristin A Linn, Russell T Shinohara, Andrea B Troxel, Abby S Van Voorhees, Joel M Gelfand
摘要

The effectiveness of psoriasis therapies in real-world settings remains relatively unknown. We sought to compare the effectiveness of less commonly used systemic therapies and commonly used combination therapies for psoriasis. This was a multicenter cross-sectional study of 203 patients with plaque psoriasis receiving less common systemic monotherapy (acitretin, cyclosporine, or infliximab) or common combination therapies (adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab and methotrexate) compared with 168 patients receiving methotrexate evaluated at 1 of 10 US outpatient dermatology sites participating in the Dermatology Clinical Effectiveness Research Network. In adjusted analyses, patients on acitretin (relative response rate 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-3.41), infliximab (relative response rate 1.93; 95% CI 1.26-2.98), adalimumab and methotrexate (relative response rate 3.04; 95% CI 2.12-4.36), etanercept and methotrexate (relative response rate 2.22; 95% CI 1.25-3.94), and infliximab and methotrexate (relative response rate 1.72; 95% CI 1.10-2.70) were more likely to have clear or almost clear skin compared with patients on methotrexate. There were no differences among treatments when response rate was defined by health-related quality of life. Single time point assessment may result in overestimation of effectiveness. The efficacy of therapies in clinical trials may overestimate their effectiveness as used in clinical practice. Although physician-reported relative response rates were different among therapies, absolute differences were small and did not correspond to differences in patient-reported outcomes.

材料
产品编号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤 水合物, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤 水合物, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤, meets USP testing specifications
SAFC
甲氨蝶呤
Supelco
甲氨蝶呤, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Supelco
甲氨蝶呤,1 X 100MG 溶液, 1.0 mg/mL in methanol with 0.1N NaOH, ampule of 1 mL, certified reference material, Cerilliant®
Supelco
环孢菌素A 溶液, 1.0 mg/mL in acetonitrile, ampule of 1 mL, certified reference material, Cerilliant®
甲氨蝶呤, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
甲氨蝶呤 水合物, ≥99.0% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
阿维A酸, ≥98.0% (HPLC)
USP
阿维A酸, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
阿维A酸, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
甲氨蝶呤, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
USP
Acitretin Related Compound A, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
甲氨蝶呤, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard