跳转至内容
Merck
CN
HomeSmall Molecules Analysis & QCAnalysis of Fixed Oils by TLC per USP 202

Qualitative Analysis of Fixed Oils acc. to USP General Chapter <202> (Method II) Using the TLC Explorer

Valanka D’Silva
R&D APAC Lab, Jigani, Bangalore, India

Abstract

This study presents a method to identify fixed oils by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) in accordance with USP General Chapter <202>. The TLC Explorer system enabled efficient chromatographic analysis and documentation. Results revealed deviations in certain market samples from reference standards, underscoring the critical role of quality assurance in fixed oils, which can be effectively supported by high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC).

Section Overview

Introduction

Fixed oils are lipids derived from plants that are essential in our daily diets, providing energy and supporting various biological functions. They contain numerous important components, including essential fatty acids, fat-soluble vitamins, nutrients, and sterols. In addition to their dietary applications, fixed oils play a vital role in pharmaceutical formulations, serving as carrier oils in ointments, injectables, and suppositories.1

The rising market demand for fixed oils has resulted in challenges related to adulteration and falsification, which undermine quality for increased profit margins. To address these issues, various chromatographic techniques, including HPTLC, HPLC, LC-MS, and GC-MS, have been utilized for chemical profiling and quality assurance of these oils.2

The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) general chapter <202> identifies thin-layer chromatography (TLC) as the method for the identification of fixed oils.3 TLC is frequently referenced in pharmacopeial methods for identity testing. High-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) is an advanced version of TLC that is robust, reliable, rapid, and cost-effective for qualitative and quantitative analysis of different compounds. This technique provides chromatographic separations or fingerprints that can be visualized for identification and quantification and can also be saved as electronic images for documentation.4,5

In this application note, the identification test for fixed oils by TLC, as specified in the USP general chapter <202> (Method II), is conducted using the new TLC Explorer documentation system (Figure 1).

A compact laboratory instrument, TLC Explorer, with a white body and a glossy black front panel. The front features a rectangular screen in the upper center, likely used for displaying readings or navigation menus. To the right of the screen are three vertically aligned indicator labels marked “VIS,” “365,” and “254,” corresponding to different light wavelengths used for TLC plate visualization. Below the screen, the black surface includes a bright green and yellow Merck logo on the left and the brand name “Supelco” in yellow on the right. The left side of the device has a small protruding switch or button. The overall design is sleek and minimalistic, with the device sitting on a white surface, suggesting it is ready for benchtop use in an analytical laboratory setting.

Figure 1.TLC Explorer.

The TLC Explorer documentation system enables the digital and automated evaluation of TLC plates, enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of thin layer chromatography analysis. The device offers three illumination modes using LED light sources—white light (VIS), UV-A (366 nm), and UV-C (254 nm) – for the detection and fast measurement of the compounds of interest. The software offers special features like automated track recognition, simultaneous measurement of multiple plates and background signal correction. Overall, the TLC Explorer offers accurate TLC imaging for reliable densitometric measurements, enabling quantitative analysis and reliable data interpretation. 

Experimental

Reagent Preparation

  • Mobile phase: Mix methylene chloride, acetic acid glacial and acetone in a ratio of 20:40:50, v:v:v.
  • Spray reagent (25 mg/mL phosphomolybdic acid in 96% alcohol): Dissolve 1.26 g of phosphomolybdic acid hydrate in 50 mL of 96% ethanol.

Standard Preparation

  • System suitability solution 1: Dissolve 25 µL of the USP corn oil RS in 3 mL of methylene chloride.
  • System suitability solution 2: Dissolve 25 µL of the USP olive oil RS in 3 mL of methylene chloride.
  • Standard solutions I-XIV: Dissolve 25 µL of the USP reference standards of the fixed oils mentioned under Table 1 in 3 mL of methylene chloride.

Sample Preparation

Sample solutions I-XIV: Dissolve 25 µL of the market samples of the fixed oils mentioned under Table 1 in 3 mL of methylene chloride.

TLC Conditions

The 30 solutions were applied across two HPTLC glass plates (Silica gel 60 RP-18 F254S) and developed using the TLC method described in Table 2

Results

System Suitability and Analysis

The identification of fixed oils performed according to USP general chapter <202> on the TLC Explorer under white light is demonstrated in Figure 2. Table 3 summarizes the system suitability results observed for USP corn oil RS and USP olive oil RS, while Tables 4 (a & b) summarize the obtained chromatographic results (retention factors, Rf) for the fixed oil reference standards and their respective market samples.

A thin-layer chromatography (TLC) chromatogram displayed under white light, featuring a series of sixteen tracks arranged horizontally across a light yellow background. Each track is outlined with a green rectangular box, enhancing visibility. The first two tracks show corn oil in track 1 and olive oil in track 2, both exhibiting faint blueish spots. The subsequent odd-numbered tracks represent fixed oil standards, while the even-numbered tracks correspond to their market samples. Notably, tracks 3 and 4 highlight peanut oil, tracks 5 and 6 represent flax seed oil, tracks 7 and 8 indicate borage seed oil, tracks 9 and 10 show cotton seed oil, tracks 11 and 12 depict palm oil, and tracks 13 and 14 illustrate safflower oil, concluding with soybean oil in tracks 15 and 16. Some tracks exhibit deviations, with varying intensities of blue spots that suggest differences between the standards and their corresponding samples.
A thin-layer chromatography (TLC) chromatogram displayed under white light, showcasing sixteen tracks arranged horizontally against a light yellow background. Each track is bordered by a green rectangular box for clarity. The first two tracks contain corn oil in tracks 1 and 2, followed by olive oil in tracks 3 and 4. Tracks 5 and 6 display sunflower oil, tracks 7 and 8 represent evening primrose oil, tracks 9 and 10 indicate sesame oil, tracks 11 and 12 show canola oil, and tracks 13 and 14 illustrate almond oil. The chromatogram reveals several blueish bands of varying intensity, with some tracks marked at the top to highlight observed differences in band patterns between the standards and their corresponding market samples.

Figure 2. (A) TLC chromatogram of plate A demonstrating the system suitability studies using corn oil (track 1) and  olive oil (track 2), as well as identification studies of fixed oil standards (odd track no.) and their market samples (even track no.) with tracks marked that showed deviations: peanut oil (tracks 3, 4), flaxseed oil (tracks 5, 6), borage seed oil (tracks 7, 8), cotton seed oil (tracks 9, 10), palm oil (11, 12), safflower oil (13, 14), and soybean oil (tracks 15, 16) under white light by the TLC Explorer; (B) TLC chromatogram of plate B demonstrating the identification studies of fixed oil standards (odd track no.) and their samples: corn oil (tracks 1, 2), olive oil (tracks 3, 4), sunflower oil (tracks 5, 6), evening primrose oil (tracks 7, 8), sesame oil (tracks 9, 10), canola oil (11, 12), and almond oil (13, 14) under white light by the TLC Explorer. (Oils where differences in the band pattern were observed between standard and market samples are marked on top of the tracks).

As required by USP general chapter <202>, the four principal spots obtained from corn oil (plate A, track 1) are clearly identified and separated, and the two principal bands obtained from olive oil (plate A, track 2, see also plate B track 3) are clearly identified and separated. 

Tables 4a & 4b. Chromatographic data (Rf) observed for standard solutions and sample solutions on Plates A & B under white light by the TLC Explorer

Conclusion

A method was utilized for the identification of fixed oils using TLC in accordance with USP general chapter <202>. The assessment and the documentation of the chromatographic results were done with the TLC Explorer documentation system. The Rf values of the principal bands in the chromatogram obtained from most fixed oil sample solutions correspond to those obtained from the respective standard solution. However, the market samples for five oils, namely peanut oil (plate A, track 4) borage seed oil (plate A, track 8), cotton seed oil (plate A, track 10), evening primrose oil (plate B, track 8), and almond oil (plate B, track 14), exhibited differences in the band pattern from their respective USP RS standards (marked track sets in Figure 2).

This application note demonstrates that the TLC Explorer documentation system serves as an efficient TLC visualizer, enabling data capture, track identification, and Rf value calculation.

Find more information on the TLC Explorer Documentation System.


Related Products

Device, Plates, Solvents & Reagents

Loading

Reference Materials

Loading

References

1.
Bhattacharya S. 2012. Prophylactic Role of Dietary Fixed Oils and Fats: A Review. [Internet]. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research.[cited 28 Jan 2025]. Available from: https://japer.in/storage/models/article/1OFEfYEOeLL0XzTLjTO5GqTv6nawOU4E3X2qg3KWxR9ipNSVCbkETKNIB2iF/prophylactic-role-of-dietary-fixed-oils-and-fats-a-review.pdf
2.
Ali S, Ekbbal R, Salar S, Yasheshwar, Ali SA, Jaiswal AK, Singh M, Yadav DK, Kumar S, Gaurav. 2023. Quality Standards and Pharmacological Interventions of Natural Oils: Current Scenario and Future Perspectives. ACS Omega. 8(43):39945-39963. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05241
3.
USP general chapter <202>: Identification of Fixed Oils by Thin-Layer Chromatography. [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.usp.org/USPNF/USPNF_M7560_02_01
4.
Attimarad M, Mueen Ahmed K, Aldhubaib BE, Harsha S. 2011. High-performance thin layer chromatography: A powerful analytical technique in pharmaceutical drug discovery. Pharmaceutical Methods. 2(2):71-75. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-4708.84436
5.
Srivastava M. 2011. An Overview of HPTLC: A Modern Analytical Technique with Excellent Potential for Automation, Optimization, Hyphenation, and Multidimensional Applications. Springer.3-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14025-9_1
登录以继续。

如要继续阅读,请登录或创建帐户。

暂无帐户?