跳转至内容
Merck
CN
  • The comparison of dispersive solid phase extraction and multi-plug filtration cleanup method based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes for pesticides multi-residue analysis by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

The comparison of dispersive solid phase extraction and multi-plug filtration cleanup method based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes for pesticides multi-residue analysis by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Journal of chromatography. A (2015-02-11)
Yuhong Qin, Pengyue Zhao, Sufang Fan, Yongtao Han, Yanjie Li, Nan Zou, Shuangyu Song, Yuan Zhang, Fangbing Li, Xuesheng Li, Canping Pan
摘要

In this study, dispersive-Solid Phase Extraction (d-SPE) cleanup and multi-plug filtration cleanup (m-PFC) methods were compared for 25 representative pesticides in six matrices (wheat, spinach, carrot, apple, citrus and peanut) by QuEChERS-LC-ESI-MS/MS detection. The type of sorbents in dispersive-SPE (d-SPE) was optimized for the above matrices. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), which mixed other materials like PSA (Primary Secondary Amines), GCB (Graphitized Carbon Black) and C18 (Octadecyl-silica), showed brilliant cleanup performance in multi residue monitoring (MRM) pesticide residue analysis. Cleanup effects with d-SPE and m-PFC methods were examined. When spiked at 3 concentration levels of 10, 100, 500 μg/kg in above matrices, for both d-SPE and m-PFC methods, the recoveries ranged from 70 to 110% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) lower than 20%. Limits of quantification (LOQs) for both cleanup methods ranged from 1 to 25 μg/kg. Matrix-matched calibrations were performed with the coefficients of determination more than 0.99 between concentration levels of 10-1000 μg/kg. It was found that m-PFC was more convenient and effective than d-SPE with the same sorbents, due to the increased contact time and contact area between the extracts and compressed sorbents. The study demonstrated that m-PFC method could be used as a rapid, convenient and high-throughput cleanup method for analysis of pesticide residues.

材料
产品编号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, suitable for HPLC, gradient grade, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
乙醇,Pure 200纯度, Molecular Biology
Sigma-Aldrich
纯乙醇, 200 proof, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
纯乙醇, 200 proof
Sigma-Aldrich
硫酸镁, anhydrous, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
纯乙醇, 200 proof, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
纯乙醇, 200 proof, anhydrous, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, Molecular Biology, DNase, RNase, and protease, none detected, ≥99% (titration)
Sigma-Aldrich
乙醇,Pure 190纯度, for molecular biology
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠 溶液, 5 M in H2O, BioReagent, Molecular Biology, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, suitable for HPLC, gradient grade, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
硫酸镁, anhydrous, reagent grade, ≥97%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, BioXtra, ≥99.5% (AT)
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, ≥99.9% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠 溶液, 0.9% in water, BioXtra, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
纯乙醇, 190 proof, ACS spectrophotometric grade, 95.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
硫酸镁, anhydrous, free-flowing, Redi-Dri, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
酒精, BioUltra, Molecular Biology, ≥99.8%, (absolute alcohol, without additive, A15 o1)
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠 溶液, 5 M
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, suitable for HPLC-GC, ≥99.8% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
硫酸镁, puriss. p.a., drying agent, anhydrous, ≥98.0% (KT), powder (very fine)
Sigma-Aldrich
硫酸镁, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture
Supelco
无水乙醇, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
纯乙醇, 190 proof, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, BioUltra, Molecular Biology, ≥99.5% (AT)
Supelco
酒精, standard for GC
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, USP, 99.0-100.5%