跳转至内容
Merck
CN
  • Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Annals of internal medicine (2015-01-07)
Raveendhara R Bannuru, Christopher H Schmid, David M Kent, Elizaveta E Vaysbrot, John B Wong, Timothy E McAlindon
摘要

The relative efficacy of available treatments of knee osteoarthritis (OA) must be determined for rational treatment algorithms to be formulated. To examine the efficacy of treatments of primary knee OA using a network meta-analysis design, which estimates relative effects of all treatments against each other. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through 15 August 2014, and unpublished data. Randomized trials of adults with knee OA comparing 2 or more of the following: acetaminophen, diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib, intra-articular (IA) corticosteroids, IA hyaluronic acid, oral placebo, and IA placebo. Two reviewers independently abstracted study data and assessed study quality. Standardized mean differences were calculated for pain, function, and stiffness at 3-month follow-up. Network meta-analysis was performed using a Bayesian random-effects model; 137 studies comprising 33,243 participants were identified. For pain, all interventions significantly outperformed oral placebo, with effect sizes from 0.63 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.39 to 0.88) for the most efficacious treatment (hyaluronic acid) to 0.18 (CrI, 0.04 to 0.33) for the least efficacious treatment (acetaminophen). For function, all interventions except IA corticosteroids were significantly superior to oral placebo. For stiffness, most of the treatments did not significantly differ from one another. Lack of long-term data, inadequate reporting of safety data, possible publication bias, and few head-to-head comparisons. This method allowed comparison of common treatments of knee OA according to their relative efficacy. Intra-articular treatments were superior to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, possibly because of the integrated IA placebo effect. Small but robust differences were observed between active treatments. All treatments except acetaminophen showed clinically significant improvement from baseline pain. This information, along with the safety profiles and relative costs of included treatments, will be helpful for individualized patient care decisions. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

材料
产品编号
品牌
产品描述

Supelco
对乙酰氨基酚, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
透明质酸 钠盐 来源于马链球菌, bacterial glycosaminoglycan polysaccharide
Sigma-Aldrich
布洛芬, ≥98% (GC)
Supelco
布洛芬, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
USP
对乙酰氨基酚, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
对乙酰氨基酚, BioXtra, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
透明质酸 钠盐 来源于公鸡鸡冠, avian glycosaminoglycan polysaccharide
Sigma-Aldrich
双氯芬酸钠 钠盐
Sigma-Aldrich
对乙酰氨基酚, meets USP testing specifications, 98.0-102.0%, powder
Supelco
双氯芬酸钠 钠盐, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
USP
布洛芬, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
对乙酰氨基酚, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
透明质酸 钠盐 来源于牛玻璃体液
Supelco
萘普生, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
透明质酸 钠盐 来源于马链球菌, mol wt 8,000-15,000
Sigma-Aldrich
( S )-(+)-布洛芬, ReagentPlus®, 99%
扑热息痛, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
布洛芬, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
透明质酸 钠盐 来源于马链球菌, mol wt 750,000-1,000,000
Sigma-Aldrich
透明质酸 钠盐 来源于马链球菌, mol wt 1,000,000-1,250,000
USP
双氯芬酸钠, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
USP
萘普生, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Supelco
布洛芬
Sigma-Aldrich
透明质酸 钠盐 来源于兽疫链球菌, bacterial glycosaminoglycan polysaccharide
Supelco
醋氨酚 溶液, 1.0 mg/mL in methanol, ampule of 1 mL, certified reference material, Cerilliant®
Supelco
布洛芬 钠盐, ≥98% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
透明质酸 钠盐 来源于马链球菌, mol wt 1,500,000-1,750,000
布洛芬, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Supelco
双氯芬酸钠 钠盐, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
萘普生, meets USP testing specifications