跳转至内容
Merck
CN
  • Comparative evaluation of seven different sample treatment approaches for large-scale multiclass sport drug testing in urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Comparative evaluation of seven different sample treatment approaches for large-scale multiclass sport drug testing in urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Journal of chromatography. A (2014-08-21)
Juan C Domínguez-Romero, Juan F García-Reyes, Antonio Molina-Díaz
摘要

Sample preparation is a critical step in large-scale multiclass analysis such as sport drug testing. Due to the wide heterogeneity of the analytes and the complexity of the matrix, the selection of a correct sample preparation method is essential, looking for a compromise between good recoveries for most of the analytes and cleanliness of the extract. In the present work, seven sample preparation procedures based on solid-phase extraction (SPE) (with 5 different cartridges), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and sorbent-supported liquid extraction (SLE) were evaluated for multiclass sport drug testing in urine. The selected SPE sorbents were polymeric cartridges Agilent PLEXA™ and Oasis HLB™, mixed mode cation and anion exchange cartridges Oasis MAX™ and MCX™, and C18 cartridges. LLE was performed using tert-butyl methyl ether and SLE was carried out using Agilent Chem Elut™ cartridges. To evaluate the proposed extraction procedures, a list of 189 compounds were selected as representative from different groups of doping agents, including 34 steroids, 14 glucocorticosteroids, 24 diuretics and masking agents, 11 stimulants, 9 beta-agonist, 16 beta-blockers, 6 Selective Estrogen Receptors Modulators (SERMs), 24 narcotics and 22 other drugs of abuse/sport drugs. Blank urine samples were spiked at two levels of concentration, 2.5 and 25μgL(-1) and extracted with the different extraction protocols (n=6). The analysis of the extracts was carried out by liquid chromatography electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The use of solid-phase extraction with polymer cartridges provided high recoveries for most of the analytes tested and was found the more suitable method for this type of application given the additional advantages such as low sample and solvent consumption along with increased automation and throughput.

材料
产品编号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, suitable for HPLC, gradient grade, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
甲醇, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
甲醇, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
氢氧化铵 溶液, ACS reagent, 28.0-30.0% NH3 basis
Sigma-Aldrich
乙酸, glacial, ACS reagent, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
甲醇, suitable for HPLC, gradient grade, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
氢氧化钠, ACS reagent, ≥97.0%, pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
乙酸, glacial, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
氢氧化钠, reagent grade, ≥98%, pellets (anhydrous)
Sigma-Aldrich
甲醇, HPLC Plus, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
氢氧化钠 溶液, 50% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
乙酸钠, anhydrous, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
丁基甲基醚, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
氢氧化铵 溶液, 28% NH3 in H2O, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
丁基甲基醚, ACS reagent, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
乙酸钠, ACS reagent, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
甲醇, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
氢氧化钠 溶液, BioUltra, Molecular Biology, 10 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
丁基甲基醚, HPLC Plus, for HPLC, GC, and residue analysis, 99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, Molecular Biology, DNase, RNase, and protease, none detected, ≥99% (titration)
Sigma-Aldrich
氢氧化钠 溶液, 1.0 N, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠 溶液, 5 M in H2O, BioReagent, Molecular Biology, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, suitable for HPLC, gradient grade, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
乙酸, glacial, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, BioXtra, ≥99.5% (AT)
Sigma-Aldrich
乙腈, ≥99.9% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
氯化钠 溶液, 0.9% in water, BioXtra, suitable for cell culture